Social Media

# Elon Musk’s Push for Free Speech Reveals Clear Bias In direction of His Personal Pursuits

Elon Musk’s Push for Free Speech Reveals Clear Bias In direction of His Personal Pursuits

Elon Musk is all the time speaking about freedom of speech, how he believes that anybody ought to be capable to say no matter they need, and the way X (previously Twitter) will enable its customers to put up no matter they like, free from authorities censorship.

Certainly, Musk has repeatedly criticized former Twitter administration for, in his view, ceding to numerous authorities calls for. But, beneath Elon, the platform has abided by each authorities request, simply with extra complaining about the way it isn’t truthful, and the way it doesn’t really wish to accomplish that.

But it surely has both method, although on the similar time, Elon has made an even bigger fuss about sure requests than others.

Why is that? Nicely, we don’t know, however you may make up your individual thoughts as to what the driving components could also be, with this checklist of presidency requests made to X, and X’s response on every case.


Turkish authorities have made essentially the most requests for censorship actions on X, with Turkish officers trying to quash dissent, notably round native elections.

In Could final 12 months, X restricted entry to posts,  on the behest of the Turkish authorities, which drew criticism from free speech activists who noticed this as straight up censorship of presidency criticism forward of the federal ballot.

Musk defended the motion, saying that:

“The selection is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or restrict entry to some tweets.”

X has since shared extra details about the specifics of Turkish authorities censorship requests, with which it has complied in each case.


India authorities have been the second most energetic in demanding content material restrictions on X, starting with the elimination of a BBC documentary that was crucial of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in early 2023. 

The documentary particularly targeted on the 2002 Gujarat riots, and questioned Modi’s management in the course of the unrest. Consequently, and amid issues that the claims might gas anti-government sentiment, the Modi Authorities requested that X take away round 50 posts that linked to the video of the documentary. 

X complied, with Elon noting on the time that:

“The foundations in India for what can seem on social media are fairly strict, and we will not transcend the legal guidelines of the nation.”

In February this 12 months, X additionally complied with Indian Authorities requests to censor posts that criticized the Authorities’s makes an attempt to quell farmers protests, which had threatened to stream into New Delhi. X did publicly query the demand, however once more, it did adhere to the request, with all the Indian Authorities’s actions designed to stifle public dissent.


Underneath Musk, X has been considerably extra keen to supply person data to German authorities investigating violations of the nation’s hate speech legal guidelines.

Germany has authorized laws that criminalize Holocaust denial, incitement of hatred in the direction of minorities and the defamation and slander of elected officers. 

Twitter had pushed again in opposition to plenty of these requests, arguing authorized specifics in sure circumstances, however X has been much more keen to cooperate with German authorities on the identical.


This month, X made a public stand in opposition to a censorship demand from the Brazilian Authorities, which pertains to a years-long investigation into political misinformation within the app.

The request stems from a long-running probe into “digital militias” which had initially been accused of spreading defamatory faux experiences about Brazil’s Supreme Courtroom justices. The amplification of those experiences had sparked protests, and even led to threats being made to the justices in query. The investigation then expanded to incorporate the incitement of protests over former President Jair Bolsonaro’s election loss in 2022, which, very like the January sixth riots within the U.S., led to Bolsonaro’s supporters storming authorities buildings, together with the Supreme Courtroom, in an try and overturn the end result.

The tip results of this investigation was a request to X to take away 150 profiles within the app which investigators had discovered to be driving these actions.

X protested the demand, claiming that it was past the bounds of Brazilian regulation, however per week later, amid mounting fines, and the specter of a full ban of the app within the area, it complied with the request. 

Elon Musk has continued to criticize Brazilian authorities for his or her calls for.


Final week, the Pakistani Authorities formally introduced a ban of X on the area, after proscribing the app since native elections have been held in February.

Pakistan’s inside ministry says that X has been banned “within the curiosity of upholding nationwide safety, sustaining public order, and preserving the integrity of our nation.”

The crux of the difficulty pertains to using X by supporters of former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who declare that he was ousted unjustly in 2022, and that this 12 months’s ballot was rigged. 

Native officers declare to have requested X to take away profiles and posts associated to this factor, which it believes might immediate unrest, and that X’s unwillingness to adjust to the request has led to the ban.

X claims that it’s unaware of any such requests.


Following the stabbing of a church chief in Sydney final week, Australia’s eSafety Fee requested that X take away posts that might threat additional inflaming tensions within the wake of the assault. 

Video of the incident was extensively shared on social platforms, which authorities declare escalated angst and unrest among the many native Assyrian Christian group. X initially labored with the Fee to restrict the distribution of the footage, however the Fee has since expanded its takedown requests to associated posts, which it believes might additionally inflame tensions. 

X claims that the Fee’s prolonged request goes too far, and has vowed to problem it in court docket. Of explicit concern is that the Fee’s calling for the content material to be eliminated for all customers worldwide, not simply Australians, which X has particularly objected to.

On stability, the vast majority of the requests relate to quelling unrest, in various varieties. Which may very well be seen as authorities overreach in some situations, and will relate to public security in others, and actually, quite a bit comes down to non-public judgment on what counts as a legitimate request, and what’s a step too far.

Which is the largest concern, that Musk is now utilizing his place as the top of X to allow sure political affect actions to go forward, as he sees match, whereas pushing again in opposition to others, depending on his private leaning. 

For instance, X has provided little resistance to requests from Indian authorities, the place his different enterprise, Tesla, is working to set up new distribution agreements. X has bowed to requests from Turkey, the place Musk has a relationship with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, and has mentioned alternatives for each Tesla and Starlink within the area.

German requests to X have been accepted at a a lot increased price than beforehand. Tesla’s key European manufacturing unit is in Berlin.

X sought to take a stand in opposition to Brazil, the place Tesla has restricted publicity, whereas Musk was additionally an ally of ousted Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, with whom he’d established a deal to make Starlink a key web supplier within the area. Since then, nonetheless, Starlink connections have been discovered to be facilitating unlawful mining operations within the Amazon, a key focus of enforcement for the present administration. That’s introduced an expanded Starlink deal into query.

X is preventing again in Australia, which can be not a crucial marketplace for Musk’s different companies, whereas he’s additionally criticized the Australian Authorities’s response to COVID, and has pushed again in opposition to different requests by the Australian eSafety watchdog associated to the rise in hate speech within the app. 

The development forming is that Musk and X wish to tackle governments that he ideologically opposes, but are extra open to working with these he agrees with.

Additionally price noting: China is a crucial accomplice for Tesla, each by way of manufacturing and gross sales.

Which is solely not what the proposed invoice is about, because it pertains to potential affect operations being facilitated by a Chinese language-owned app, as assessed by cyber safety consultants. Primarily based on Elon’s strategy, Russian and Chinese language state media must also be freely allowed to broadcast within the U.S., even when what they share is unfaithful, and seeks to sway American voters.  

Basically, Musk is a massively compromised entity, with such vital bias that he shouldn’t be in control of making coverage rulings on any social platform. 

You can argue, after all (as many have), that Twitter was biased in the direction of left leaning insurance policies for years, and that he’s merely re-balancing the slate. However that’s not even the case. Elon is biased in the direction of Elon, and no matter advantages him and his pursuits. 

On this sense, Elon is utilizing X as a type of political affect all of his personal. Elon can’t run for President (as a result of he wasn’t born within the U.S.), so he’s carving his personal political area of interest, with a view to shift opinions in the direction of outcomes that profit him, by way of the app.

That’s an especially harmful state of affairs, and one which appears unsustainable in the long run.

Andrew Hutchinson
Content material and Social Media Supervisor


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button