# X Says That Over 500K Customers Now Contribute to Group Notes

Table of Contents
X Says That Over 500K Customers Now Contribute to Group Notes
X (previously Twitter) has reached one other milestone with its crowd-sourced fact-checking Group Notes function, with over 500,000 contributors now feeding notes into the system.

As per X:
“There at the moment are over half 1,000,000 Group Notes contributors in 70 international locations world wide. Taking a minute to replicate on what contributors have performed: in 2023 we confirmed 37,000+ notes properly over 14 billion occasions, and in simply the primary 4 months of 2024, we’ve already proven 29,000+ notes which were seen over 9 billion occasions. A tremendous tempo of development, protecting extra subjects in additional languages each day.”
Group Notes, initially known as Birdwatch, was an initiative spearheaded by Jack Dorsey when he was in command of Twitter again in 2021. This system allows X customers to contribute fact-checks and corrections, with citations and references then displayed in-stream.

The thought is that this may increase the platform’s capability to counter misinformation, and restrict its unfold, and research have proven that it may be an efficient deterrent in serving to to scale back the amplification of false experiences.
Certainly, as cited by X, research have proven that:
- Customers repost content material 61% much less usually after a submit will get a Group Word
- Posts are deleted at a lot greater charges as soon as a Group Word has been hooked up
- Group Notes are perceived as “considerably extra reliable” than conventional misinformation flags
There undoubtedly is a worth to the Group Notes system, and enabling customers to contribute their very own fact-checks and clarifications on posts, and it has had an total constructive impact. Although numerous different research have proven the Group Notes is not efficient at dispelling all sorts of misinformation inside the app, largely as a result of the method is simply too gradual to restrict the unfold of false info earlier than it’s had an impact, and due to X’s systematic necessities which imply that every one Notes must get settlement from folks of opposing political viewpoints earlier than they’re displayed within the app.
And that does have a big effect. In response to a examine performed by MediaWise final 12 months, solely round 8.5% of the Group Notes created are ever displayed within the app, with many divisive subjects by no means getting correct fact-checks as a result of they fail to succeed in cross-political settlement.
X is regularly refining its system, notably when it comes to the time it takes for a Word to be proven within the app. However the primary necessities of assessment and settlement do imply that Group Notes fail to dispel many experiences earlier than they’ve had an opportunity to proliferate, whereas on many subjects, Notes are merely by no means proven as a result of they don’t obtain the required consensus.
Which isn’t such an enormous drawback when Group Notes is used as a complement to inner moderation methods. However as X continues to place extra reliance on crowd-sourced reality checks, in substitute of inner labor, that does result in potential flaws.
Certainly, the European Fee just lately requested an evidence from X as to why its moderation workforce has decreased from 2,294 employees in September to 1,849 as of April 2024.
X, in fact, has reduce over 80% of its complete employees since Musk took management of the app, and plenty of have praised its cost-cutting, given the comparatively minimal impacts on the platform, at the least externally.
However on the identical time, numerous experiences have indicated that hate speech is on the rise within the app, in addition to numerous different content material considerations, together with porn bots and spam, which possible would have been weeded out, or at the least decreased, by a broader moderation workforce.
However X appears decided that Group Notes is a greater means ahead, and that its consumer neighborhood is best positioned to average content material, versus a company-appointed set of assessors.
Seemingly, X’s advert companions don’t agree, with the corporate’s advert consumption reportedly nonetheless down 50% on earlier ranges.
However on the identical time Group Notes is bettering, and increasing, and perhaps, at some stage, there can be a degree the place its capability will increase sufficient to cowl the workload misplaced from the discount in employees moderators.
Andrew Hutchinson