#Is the story of Grakappan from Severance Season 2 Episode 5 actual? – Destructoid

Early on in Severance Season 2 Episode 5, aptly titled Trojan’s Horse, Milchick compares Helena Eagan going undercover as Helly because the occasions of the Season 1 finale to the story of Grakappan. (Prouncouced Grak-Shoe-Pin) However is the story of Grakappan really actual, or simply made up by Milchick?

What’s the Story of Grakappan?

The story of Grakappan is referenced by Milchick early on within the episode when Helly questions why her outie, Helean Eagan, was on the Severance flooring imitating her. After pondering the query, Milchick responds with a query, “Have you ever ever heard the story of Grakappan?”. Understandably, none of them had.

“In historic instances the King of Sweden himself was recognized to go incognito amongst his folks within the hopes of studying their true grievances. He would don an outdated, grey gown, a Grakappan, the title for which he was remembered, to disguise his royal vestments,” Milchick would clarify. “Kier Eagan himself was recognized to take action in his ether factories, and Ms. Eagan was carrying on this noble custom.”

So, in accordance with Milchick, Helena Eagan was primarily doing her personal model of Undercover Boss to attempt to be taught the grievances of the MDR workforce to make Lumon a greater office. We, the viewers, know that isn’t the case, and fortunately Mark, Helly, and Dylan aren’t shopping for it both.

The present, and extra importantly administration in Severance, like Milchick, are not any strangers to creating up tales, so it will be comprehensible to marvel if the story of Grakappan is definitely true or perhaps a actual factor.

So is the Story of Grakappan really actual?

Sure, the story of Grakappan is definitely actual. After the top of the Scanian Conflict between Sweden and Denmark in 1679, King Charles XI grew to become referred to as the Greycoat, or the Grakappan in Swedish. He would deliberately disguise himself and go to villages throughout Sweden in search of to identify corruption towards the populace from larger orders of energy, normally the corrupt church.

One well-known story from King Charles XI actions as Grakappan talks of him visiting a village in disarray whereas its priest lived lavishly, whereas one other close by village was in excellent situation however its priest was in poverty. King Charles XI switched the 2 monks to unravel this problem.

So the premise for Milchick’s comparability of Helena Eagan’s actions relies on actual occasions. Nonetheless, I wouldn’t be shocked if his story about Kier Eagan doing the identical as his ether factories is a fabricated a part of the story.