Social Media

# FTC Fines Messaging App NGL Over Misleading Practices

FTC Fines Messaging App NGL Over Misleading Practices

The FTC has had a vital victory in opposition to misleading practices by social media apps, albeit by way of a smaller participant within the area.

At the moment, the FTC has introduced that non-public messaging app NGL, which grew to become successful with teen customers again in 2022, shall be fined $5 million, and be banned from permitting folks beneath 18 to make use of the app in any respect, attributable to deceptive approaches and regulatory violations.

NGL app

NGL’s key worth proposition is that it allows customers to submit nameless replies to questions posed by customers of the app. Customers can share their NGL questions on IG and Snapchat, prompting recipients to submit their responses by way of the NGL platform. Customers are then capable of view these responses, with out data on who despatched them. In the event that they wish to know who truly despatched every message, nevertheless, they’ll pay a month-to-month subscription price for full performance.

The FTC discovered that NGL had acted deceptively, in a number of methods, first by simulating responses when actual people didn’t reply.

As per the FTC:

A lot of these nameless messages that customers had been advised got here from folks they knew – for instance, “one in every of your folks is hiding s[o]mething from u” – had been truly fakes despatched by the corporate itself in an effort to induce further gross sales of the NGL Professional subscription to folks desperate to study the identification of who had despatched the message.

So for those who paid, you had been solely revealing {that a} bot had despatched you a message.

The FTC additionally alleges that NGL’s UI didn’t clearly state that its fees for revealing a sender’s identification had been a recurring price, versus a one-off value.

However much more concerningly, the FTC discovered that NGL did not implement enough protections for teenagers, regardless of “touting “world class AI content material moderation” that enabled them to “filter out dangerous language and bullying.”

“The corporate’s a lot vaunted AI usually did not filter out dangerous language and bullying. It shouldn’t take synthetic intelligence to anticipate that teenagers hiding behind the cloak of anonymity would ship messages like “You’re ugly,” “You’re a loser,” “You’re fats,” and “Everybody hates you.” However a media outlet reported that the app did not display screen out hurtful (and all too predictable) messages of that kind.”

The FTC was notably pointed in regards to the proclaimed use of AI to reassure customers (and oldsters):

The defendants’ sadly named “Security Heart” precisely anticipated the apprehensions mother and father and educators would have in regards to the app and tried to guarantee them with guarantees that AI would resolve the issue. Too many firms are exploiting the AI buzz du jour by making false or misleading claims about their supposed use of synthetic intelligence. AI-related claims aren’t puffery. They’re goal representations topic to the FTC ‘s long-standing substantiation doctrine.

It’s the primary time that the FTC has applied a full ban on children utilizing a messaging app, and it may assist it set up new precedent round teen security measures throughout the trade.

The FTC can be seeking to implement expanded restrictions on how Meta makes use of teen consumer knowledge, whereas it’s additionally looking for to ascertain extra definitive guidelines round adverts focused at customers beneath 13.

Meta’s already implementing extra restrictions on this entrance, stemming each from EU legislation adjustments and proposals from the FTC. However the regulatory group is looking for extra concrete enforcement measures, together with trade customary processes for verifying consumer ages.

Within the case of NGL, a few of these violations had been extra blatant, resulting in elevated scrutiny total. However the case does open up extra scope for expanded measures in different apps.

So when you could not use NGL, and should not have been uncovered to the app, the expanded ripple impact may nonetheless be felt.


Andrew Hutchinson
Content material and Social Media Supervisor

Supply

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button